Principles

A principle has to be earned.

Not proposed, not believed, not borrowed from someone who said it well. Earned by an observation that argued it in public and survived. Three have. The rest are still under examination, and they are listed as such.

Under examination

No reference, no link, and no page. Nothing has argued them yet. Some will earn their argument. Some will not survive one.

People follow the path of least resistance.
Design the system, not the hero.
Capability scales.
Identity drives behaviour.
Preparation raises the floor.
Freedom requires responsibility.
Recovery is part of performance.

Why the split is visible

Eight of these could be written up in a week and the page would look finished. It would also be a list of things nobody had argued for, which is what most principle pages are.

So the examining list stays plain. No reference, no link, nothing to click. It is a record of what is being worked on, not a claim that the work is done.

Which principle does your organisation state, and which one does it actually run on?